Carbon dating shroud error repair

Rated 4.18/5 based on 597 customer reviews

It would also have to avoid paints, dyes, and any medium that would bind the fibers.To date, none of the attempts to reverse-engineer the presumed forger’s technique have succeeded—the parameters are too specific.Among other errors, the scientist who cut the samples, working under the direction of two textile experts unfamiliar with the Shroud, took all of them from near a repair patch made in the 16th century rather than from different areas of the cloth.As the French scientists recently reported, the raw data from the tests “strongly suggests” that “homogeneity is lacking;” i.e., the samples were contaminated.The “medieval forgery” theory requires a plausible explanation of its creation that fits all the key characteristics of the Shroud image.

The “medieval forgery” theory asks us to believe a medieval super-genius was able not only to transfer a latent 3D image of a beaten and tortured man onto linen but also other interesting details that show up only in a modern laboratory environment using modern tools.His technique was so specific that, despite his being limited to High Middle Ages technology, every attempt to reproduce the method has failed or omitted at least one key characteristic.Furthermore, this monstrously clever person left no other clue to his existence except an allusion in the draft of a bishop’s letter. Perhaps an extraterrestrial mischief-maker was pranking us.The scientists performing the test complained and protested the departures from the 1986 “Turin protocol” devised to guide the process.Even assuming their ignorance of the cutting fiasco, they had every reason to believe the integrity of the experiment had been compromised, undermining its credibility.

Leave a Reply